XML Print


1- SENIOR RESIDENT
2- assistant professor , dr.karvi1593@gmail.com
3- professor and head
Abstract:   (216 Views)
Background and Objectives:Colistin is regarded as the final resort for managing infections caused by multi-drug resistance (MDR) gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is used to monitor the development of colistin resistance. This study aimed to assess the performance of  Broth Microdilution Method (BMD) against routine Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion (KBDD) and automated BD Phoenix for the detection of in vitro activity of colistin against GNB
Methods: A cross-sectional study was done in the Department of Microbiology, LLRM Medical College, Meerut Uttar Pradesh from September 2023 to January 2024. KBDD method, BMD method  & BD Phoenix (Becton Dickinson, USA) automated system were used in 320 GNB isolated from various clinical samples to detect Colistin susceptibility. MIC determined by BMD method was interpreted according to  Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2023 guidelines.
Results: In our study,320 isolates of GNB were identified from the patients with a mean age of 45.34 years. A total of 320 isolates [145(45.31%) Escherichia coli, 124(38.75%) Klebsiella pneumoniae, 32(10.0%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 19(5.93%) Acinetobacter baumannii complex] were tested simultaneously with all three methods for colistin susceptibility. The overall resistance to Colistin amongst GNB was found to be 17.18%  by the gold standard BMD method, 15.31% by BD Phoenix, and 14.37%  by KBDD.
Conclusion: BMD is the most cost-effective, authentic method for routine testing of colistin susceptibility as compared to other methods. The comparative analysis revealed that BMD is superior to other methods in detecting colistin susceptibility emphasizing its potential role in guiding clinicians for treatment decisions
Full-Text [PDF 443 kb]   (67 Downloads)    
Research Article: Research Article | Subject: Microbiology
Received: 2024/03/22 | Accepted: 2025/02/23

References
1. El-Sayed Ahmed MA, Zhong LL, Shen C, Yang Y, Doi Y, Tian GB. Colistin and its role in the Era of antibiotic resistance: an extended review (2000-2019). Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):868-85. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Gwozdzinski K, Azarderakhsh S, Imirzalioglu C, Falgenhauer L, Chakraborty T. An improved medium for colistin susceptibility testing.J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(5):e01950-17. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Matuschek E, Åhman J, Webster C, Kahlmeter G. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin-evaluation of seven commercial MIC products against standard broth microdilution for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(8):865-70. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/General_documents/Recommendations_for_MIC_determination_of_colistin_March_2016.pdf).http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/General_documents/Recommendations_for_MIC_determination_of_colistin_March_2016.pdf)
5. Gales AC, Jones RN, Sader HS. Contemporary activity of colistin and polymyxin B against a worldwide collection of Gram-negative pathogens: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2006-09). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(9):2070-4. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 33RD ed. CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2023. ا [View at Publisher]
7. CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that grow aerobically. 11th ed. CLSI standard M07. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;2018. [View at Publisher]
8. Taneja N, Singh G, Singh M, Sharma M. Emergence of tigecycline & colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii in patients with complicated urinary tract infections in north India. Indian J Med Res. 2011;133(6):681-4. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Aggarwal R, Rastogi N, Mathur P, Soni KD, Kumar S, Gupta A, et al. Colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in surgical polytrauma intensive care unit of level-1 trauma center: first case series from trauma patients in India. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018;22(2):103-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Goel G, Hmar L, Sarkar De M, Bhattacharya S, Chandy M. Colistin-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: Report of a Cluster of 24 Cases from a New Oncology Center in Eastern India. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(8):1076-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Arjun R, Gopalakrishnan R, Nambi PS, Kumar DS, Madhumitha R, Ramasubramanian V. A study of 24 patients with colistin-resistant Gram-negative isolates in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2017;21(5):317-21. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. Pragasam AK, Shankar C, Veeraraghavan B, Biswas I, Nabarro LEB, Inbanathan FY, et al. Molecular mechanisms of colistin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae causing bacteremia from India-a first report. Front Microbiol. 2017;7:2135. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Anita,Kumari R, Saurabh K, Kumar S, Kumari N. Comparative Evaluation of Broth Microdilution with Disc Diffusion and VITEK 2 for Susceptibility Testing of Colistin on Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. Cureus. 2023;15(12):e50894. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Zaki ME, ElKheir NA, Mofreh M. Molecular study of colistin-resistant clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae species. J Clin Mol Med. 2018;1(1):1-4. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15. Pawar SK, Karande GS, Shinde RV, Pawar VS. Emergence of colistin-resistant Gram-negative Bacilli, in a tertiary care rural hospital from Western India. Indian J Microbiol Res. 2016;3(3):308-13. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. Butta H, Mendiratta L, Sardana R, Gilotra K, Hasan S, Kansal S, et al. Detecting In-Vitro Colistin Resistance-A Comparative Study Between Broth Microdilution Versus Vitek-2 For Colistin Susceptibility Testing. APALM. 2020;7(7):A336-340 [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17. Bernhardt JS, Tellis RC, Motagi A, PP A. Colistin and Polymyxin B sensitivity by broth microdilution among carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli. Biomedicine. 2023;43(6):1789-93. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Ramesh N, Prasanth M, Ramkumar S, Suresh M, Tamhankar AJ, Gothandam KM, et al. Colistin susceptibility of gram-negative clinical isolates from Tamil Nadu, India. Asian biomedicine. 2016;10(1):35-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Behera B, Jena J, Kar P, Mohanty S, Mahapatra A. Deciphering polymyxin B minimum inhibitory concentration from colistin minimum inhibitory concentration and vice versa: An analysis on 156 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2018;36(4):587-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Lai C-C, Chen Y-S, Lee N-Y, Tang H-J, Lee S S-J, Lin C-F, et al. Susceptibility rates of clinically important bacteria collected from intensive care units against colistin, carbapenems, and other comparative agents: Results from surveillance of multicenter antimicrobial resistance in Taiwan (SMART). Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:627-40. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Pfennigwerth N, Kaminski A, Korte-Berwanger M, Pfeifer Y, Simon M, Werner G, et al. Evaluation of six commercial products for colistin susceptibility testing in Enterobacterales. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(11):1385-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.