XML Print


1- Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India
2- Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India , sree.path177@gmail.com
Abstract:   (607 Views)
Background: Conventional Tissue Processing (CTP) is the gold standard method for tissue processing; however, the method is relatively time-consuming. Microwave Tissue Processing (MTP) reduces the turnaround time and gives comparable histomorphology to CTP. The objective was to compare the Laboratory-grade Microwave Processing (LMP) and Domestic Microwave tissue Processing (DMP) with CTP in terms of histomorphology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining.
Methods: Three tissue bits from 89 formalin-fixed resection specimens received in the histopathology laboratory were processed by CTP, LMP, and DMP processing methods. The specimens were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 hours. The sections were stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H and E) stain. In subgroup analysis, IHC was done on 17 relevant cases using two antibodies, Ki67 (Nuclear) and Pancytokeratin (Membranous and cytoplasmic). Parameters such as the clarity of section, cytoplasmic details, nuclear details, color intensity, and interface of epithelium and connective tissue were studied. Parameters like color intensity, localization of antigen, background staining, and crispness of staining were studied on IHC. The results were analyzed using Kappa statistics.
Results: There was a fair to moderate agreement between CTP and LMP. There was a slight to fair agreement between CTP to DMP and LMP to DMP.
Conclusion: Microwave tissue processing reduced the turnaround time. The overall quality of LMP tissue was better than DMP and was equally good as that of CTP.
Full-Text [PDF 739 kb]   (202 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (2 Views)  
Research Article: Original Paper | Subject: Laboratory Sciences
Received: 2023/06/6 | Accepted: 2024/05/20

References
1. Amrutha N, Patil S, Rao RS. Microwaves: a revolution in histoprocessing. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014:15(2);149-52. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Tosuner Z, Karaer O, İnce Ü. Lean Six Sigma Applications in a Multicenter Pathology Laboratory: An Industrial Pathology Model. Research. 2023:4(55). [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
3. Mathai AM, Naik R, Pai MR, Rai S, Baliga P. Microwave histoprocessing versus conventional histoprocessing. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008; 51(1):12-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Chandy D, Swetha D'Souza P, Jeyalyn David S. Tissue Processing using Microwave Oven: A Boon for Histology Slide Preparation. International Journal of Anatomy and Research. 2024;12(2):8903-09. [View at Publisher] [DOI]
5. Patil S, Rao RS, Nagaraja A, Kumar SD. Comparison of conventional and microwave histo-processing of various oral soft tissue specimens. Journal of Dental Research and Review. 2014;1(1):3-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Rao M, Pai SM, Khanagar SB, Siddeeqh S, Devang DD, Naik S. Microwave-assisted tissue processing, fixation and staining in tissues of different thicknesses: A comparative study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2020;24(1):186. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Bhuvanamha devi R, Subhasree AR, Parameaswari PJ, Parijatham BO . Domestic microwave versus conventional tissue processing: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(5):835-39. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Shrestha G, Karki S, Pradhan A. Changing perspective on tissue processing-comparison of microwave histoprocessing method with the conventional method. Journal of Pathology of Nepal. 2015;5(10):841-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
9. Rohr LR, Layfield LJ, Wallin D, Hardy D. A comparison of routine and rapid microwave tissue processing in a surgical pathology laboratory: quality of histologic sections and advantages of microwave processing. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115(5):703-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Emerson LL, Tripp SR, Baird BC, Layfield LJ, Rohr LR. A comparison of immunohistochemical stain quality in conventional and rapid microwave processed tissues. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125(2):176-83. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Rohr LR, Layfield LJ, Wallin D, Hardy D. A comparison of routine and rapid microwave tissue processing in a surgical pathology laboratory: quality of histologic sections and advantages of microwave processing. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115(5):703-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2007 All Rights Reserved | Medical Laboratory Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.